HOW WE PUBLISH
Useful guidance, checked openly.
This policy explains how Get Unscrambler content is prepared, what its automated checks can establish, and where editorial or dictionary limitations remain.
Get Unscrambler publishes solver explanations, worked examples, practice drills, and trust information. The site does not identify a named editor or claim professional credentials. Its goal is to help readers understand a method—not to create pages merely because a phrase receives searches.
A strategy page should explain when a method applies, demonstrate it on a letter rack, identify likely failure modes, provide a practice task, and state where dictionary or game rules can change the answer.
WHO
Published under the site name.
Content is attributed to Get Unscrambler, the site itself; this is not a named individual or credentialed editorial staff. Get Unscrambler is an independent word utility and is not endorsed by a particular game, tournament, or dictionary publisher. Questions and corrections can be sent through the Contact page.
HOW
Every example must balance.
Inventory tests
Automated checks compare curated examples with stated spelling rules, letter counts, and the bundled files. Tests do not establish that a word is accepted by another dictionary.
Solver behavior
Regression tests exercise repeated letters, blank tiles, exact-anagram mode, subset searches, and filters in the shared matching engine.
Rules disclaimer
We identify when acceptance may vary because games and dictionaries use different spelling, inflection, and proper-noun rules.
THE PUBLICATION CHECKLIST
What a guide must contain.
| Review area | Required evidence | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| Distinct purpose | A specific reader problem that is not already answered fully by another page | Prevents near-duplicate pages built around keyword variations |
| Letter accuracy | Every worked candidate balances against its stated rack, including duplicates and blanks | Keeps examples mechanically reproducible |
| Practical depth | A method, decision aid, mistake diagnosis, drill, and next step | Lets a reader act without searching again for basic instructions |
| Clear limits | A note when dictionaries, scoring systems, or game rules can differ | Separates candidate generation from an official ruling |
| Search language | Natural wording that reflects the question people ask, without repeated keyword blocks | Supports discovery while keeping the page readable |
AI ASSISTANCE
Drafting help does not replace review.
AI-assisted drafting may be used to organize explanations and exercises. Automated checks can catch defined spelling and inventory mistakes, but they cannot provide a human subject-matter review or certify dictionary acceptance. The site does not claim that every passage has received individual human review, and it does not present generated text as personal experience.
ORIGINALITY
We add analysis, not stitched summaries.
Our useful contribution is the combination of controlled letter inventories, side-by-side strategy choices, failure diagnosis, and drills that can be replayed in the live solver. We do not copy dictionary definitions, scrape competitor result pages, or create a route for every automatic letter combination.
When a concept is widely known—such as treating -ING as a possible suffix—we make the page useful through the decision process around it: when to reserve the ending, how to reverse a spelling change, when to release the hypothesis, and how to verify the final inventory. That practical layer is the standard we use to judge whether a page deserves to exist.
UPDATES & CORRECTIONS
Dates should reflect meaningful changes.
The site avoids displaying a review date unless a substantive review date can be supported. If you report a possible error, include the letters, expected result, page URL, and the dictionary or game rules involved when relevant.
For more about the product and its independence, read About Get Unscrambler.
CORRECTION PROCESS
From report to resolution.
- 1
Reproduce the exact search
We use the reported rack, wildcards, filters, page, and word-list category rather than testing a simplified version of the problem.
- 2
Classify the issue
We determine whether it concerns letter matching, ranking, the bundled list, an explanation, or a game-specific acceptance difference.
- 3
Correct the smallest responsible layer
A content error is fixed in the page; a matching error is fixed in the solver; a ruleset difference receives a clearer limitation rather than a false universal claim.
- 4
Record verified changes
Dates should be added only when the publication or substantive review event can be supported; formatting alone is not a reason to show a new date.